The circumcision complex divides the human race into sub-races that otherwise appear segregated on a politico-religious basis. The conflict cannot be resolved by reason because the sub-races have a neurophysiological difference. They differ in the channelling of the mighty sexual energy. Parts of their brains have been differently rewired. And the sexual drive, even the redirected one, is far more persuasive than any intellectual argument.
The advancing technologies of modernity rapidly increase the destructive potential of repressed sexuality. Perhaps the acknowledgment of the mental effects of paedocircumcision could bring them under control and mitigate the religious conflict around the world. But we are unsure if that is sufficient. One can hardly expect that religious disagreements could be reconciled as long as the difference in attitudes on which they are based continues to be induced.
Human sexuality has been supressed and held in a primitive stage by circumcision and religious moral for millennia. Considering this we are sceptical about the ability of manhood to quickly master their passions in a safe way. We are inclined to think that only a veto on circumcision in Europe could allow the effective integration of circumcising minorities. Such a ban will naturally dispel the clannishness of the circumcised communities. The effect will take one or two generations to develop but should be lasting. We feel that only the eradication of circumcision in the world could prevent a new world war based on religious intolerance.
Note that the abolishment of circumcision does not entail the suppression of circumcising religions because circumcision is not a God’s commandment in their holy writs but a covenant or a recommendation. On the contrary, we believe that the abolishment of circumcision could only do well to religions. It would purify them by eliminating artificially induced piety. Actually, the circumcising religions must be the first to prohibit circumcision given that they realize the untruthfulness of the devotion it evokes. The opposite could indicate that they are interested in the quantity of their followers hence of the political power instead of in the quality of their connection with the divine.
Human evolution, in our opinion, is driven mainly by the profuse human sexuality and related sensitivity. Paedocircumcision suppresses the human sensitivity therefore it inhibits the evolution. It diverts human sexuality toward abstractions and makes them obsessive. The intellectual progress gained by circumcision is impractical, unethical and generates bias and segregation. Yet the sublimation of sexual energies it prompts is artificial and deprives humans of the ability to control their sexuality.
Only the natural state of genitalia allows a natural redirection of human sexuality so that its power is used constructively and in a controlled way. Only the abolishment of routine paedocircumcision could resume and renormalize the biological and social evolution of man and pacify ethnic tensions.
A proper cultivation of human sexuality, however, instead of its suppression, diversion and transformation into god-fearing, dependence, overproduction or ethnocentrism is needed in order for man’s great brain potential to be rewardingly utilized. Discontinuing circumcision necessitates new education in order for the unleashed potential to be utilized.
Abolishment of mass paedocircumcision is the first step that has to be taken toward the alchemic reawakening of humanity. It may seem heresy to those who are god-fearing. It may seem a provocation to those who are desensitized. It may seem ethnically intolerant to those who circumcision consolidates or favours. It may seem undemocratic to those who tolerate physically-inflicted inequality. It may seem unacceptable to those whom circumcision has chosen to think so. Eradication of paedocircumcision may seem difficult to perform but is certainly much easier than perpetually overcoming the accumulating effects of the dissatisfactions and biases it stirs.
Human race cannot be united as long as their erotic attitudes are forcefully maintained different and obsessive.
We are on a peace mission here. We strive for a clear-minded and nonviolent future. In it sexuality and intellect cooperate instead of battle each other.
The time is over-ripe, we feel. The more we fear our sexuality the more aggressive it becomes.
Join our army of open-minded peace-makers defending natural sublimation.