What would you think if somebody turns to you with: “Hey you, unkicked in the balls?” Of course you would feel threatened.
People have heads. Usually this is not mentioned because it is natural. Neither are they described as unbeheaded or non-headless.
Those who have their foreskins intact find that labelling them “uncircumcised” is intimidating, offensive, discriminatory and unnatural. They categorically disapprove of it. The term also implies that circumcised condition is natural which is simply not true. If someone thinks otherwise he is probably non-uncircumcised.
We are not willing to insult intact men by relating normality to circumcised state. So on our site we shall refer to the intact state as natural state, to intact men as natural men and to intact people generally as naturals.
Neither we are willing to repel the circumcised readers. So we shall not refer to them as denaturalized.
Let us remind them that their religious writs are discriminatory of natural men. The least they do is to speak of them as uncircumcised. But the writs also state that natural men are unrefined, foolish, stubborn and stiff-naked. Let the naturals forgive these scripts as they are written by circumcised to whom preconception is not unnatural because they are blessed by the supernatural.