Most researches having intact foreskins claim that pedocircumcision is needless and harmful.[i] They find that it causes traumas and stress, has a negative effect on child-mother bonding and possibly develops a tendency to violence. Unlike them, circumcised researches maintain that circumcision is not only harmless but is even healthful. Circumcised researches even tend to invent beneficial aspects of pedocircumcision.

Notice that the advocates of pedocircumcision use contradicting arguments that have nothing to do with the original goal of the practice. They either insist that circumcision has no effect on erogenous sensitivity or that it enhances sexual pleasure. These claims not only contradict one another but each of them is biologically irrational and cannot be taken seriously. To accept that the removal of receptors has no effect on the sensitivity they provide for is to deny their physiological function. To assume that the removal of receptors enhances the sensory perception is to ascribe them the role of suppressing neural excitation which is contrary to the definition of receptor. Not to mention that increased pleasure offends the morals of religions performing routine pedocircumcision. The proponents of circumcision offer everything that hesitating men could be fond of – from lack of effect to medical benefits and increased sexual pleasure. 

Why the circumcised doctors are 5 times more likely to recommend circumcision to their patients?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Only with their backs to the wall when pedocircumcision is about to be banned do they resort to the freedom of religion. Then they declare that circumcision is central to their lives and religion and they will do it illegally if needed.[ii]

But what their religion says about circumcision is that the practice refines spirituality and alters mentality towards piousness. Therefore according to the holy writs of the first circumcising religion circumcised people including physicians and researchers are unobjective. The main intent of pedocircumcision is cultivation of religious bias.[iii] We may ask ourselves whether circumcision proponents are aware of this.

Also we may ask ourselves whether religiousness based on artificially induced mental bias is genuine.

 
Share →

Leave a Reply

Circumcision to Terrorism
Circumcision is not simply a cosmetic procedure performed ...
A Peace Mission
The circumcision complex divides the human race into sub-races […]
ponik shad
homunculus shad
The site needs your help in standing its ground.
If you find this work valuable,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex task is difficult but well worth the effort.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
Survival requires more than sympathy.
If you find this work important,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to cut through.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
Survival requires more than sympathy.
If you find this work progressive,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to cut through.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
This website relies on your goodwill.
If you find it valuable,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to cut through.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
This website relies on your goodwill.
If you find it valuable,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to cut through.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
This website relies on your goodwill.
If you find it valuable,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to cut through.
CLOSE
ponik shad
homunculus shad
Comparison of facts and feelings gives birth to truth.
If you find the site informative,
please support its author and developer.
The Circumcision Complex concept still has many things to tell.
CLOSE