Patriarchy is the democracy of pedocircumcised
The sexual dissatisfaction that pedocircumcision causes necessitates compensation in this life too. Pedocircumcision of men disposes to patriarchalism and polygyny. In confirmation, pedocircumcising ethnoses practice polygyny and their religions promote or tolerate it. Yet, mid-childhood circumcision requires more distinct sexual compensations than neonatal circumcision. As a result polygyny is imperative to Islamic countries but is not so vital to Jews who abolished it when they got integrated in Europe during the 11th century.
Polygyny entails that some men have more women at the expense of the rest because both sexes have approximately equal prevalence. The inequality of sexual possessions, however, is not considered a social injustice in Muslim countries. Perhaps this is so because Muslim men feel that the complete gratification is principally unattainable or physically impossible and hence is secondary in importance to the promised one in the spiritual world. When complete gratification is practically unreachable sexual possessions cannot produce significant inequality. Circumcised men are always equal in their insatiability. Their important sexual rights are unobtainable in this life. The real rivalry among them must be for the access to the promised fulfilment in paradise.
Pedocircumcised crave satisfaction that they cannot fully experience in the here and now. Harems rather serve as an example of the World to Come to those who are desensitised. The earthly sexual possessions are previews of the future of the righteous, attractors to paradise for the desensitised that straighten their faith.
The inequality of possessions does not contradict democratic principles. The desire to obtain more possessions including sexual ones is a motivator in democratic societies. It is the driving force of the modern democratic capitalism.
Sexual hunger is a more imperative, concrete and primal need than the desire to possess material things and social power. The ability to have more spouses is the mightiest motivator to all men and is especially powerful in desensitised men. Patriarchy, polygyny, male chauvinism and religion promising eternal potency and satisfaction to males are the freedoms that pedocircumcised feel very important. Inequality of sexual possessions is democracy to pedocircumcising societies.
The unfair sex chauvinism
Circumcision suppresses sensuality more strongly than morals because it trims it at a fundamental biological level. Foreskin owners needed smaller compensations for the nonphysical suppression of sexuality than circumcised men. Christianity allowed the foreskin and relied mainly on morals to suppress the feared sexuality.
Christianity outlawed polygyny and limited the amount of spouses a man can have to one. The reason for this may be sought in the greater sexual satisfaction achievable by Christians. The unimpaired sensitivity of the penis granted them independency of masturbation and gratification. This eventually reduced their need of compensations for dissatisfaction and the imperativeness of their desire to obtain more sexual possessions.
Male chauvinism may seem undemocratic to those men who are able to discharge their passions to the full. But sexual possessiveness is the only sensible need to those men who are unable to satisfy their hungers completely or adequately, not even for a moment. The possibility to enlarge sexual possession stimulates those who suffer chronic dissatisfaction, compensates for it and makes future attractive to them. The existence of wealthy people brings hope to the poor and makes them docile in democratic societies. Similarly, the existence of harem owners provides the poor and lonely desensitised men with a practical example of the world to come in Muslim countries.
Erogenous deficiency is a strong motivator for those who were circumcised as children. As long as Muslims circumcise their boys Islamic societies will find sex inequality rational and fair. Polygyny, patriarchy and male chauvinism are natural social results of male erogenous deficiency.
Nature made male sex stronger and more assertive. Cutting out the most sensitive and hence feminine erogenous tissue renders men hypermasculine[i] and hyperactive. It can also make them aggressive. As the lack of prepuce callouses the glans so the reduction of feminine sensitivity hardens emotionality. Pedocircumcision makes men unsympathetic, overly assertive, competitive and inadequately aggressive. It renders the stronger sex unfair and intolerant. Undoubtedly pedocircumcision is a factor of hypermasculinity and male chauvinism.