Self-made racial advantages
because of his appearance,
nor is circumcision something
just external and physical.
Bible, Romans 2:28
What ideologies of circumcising religions and Nazi have in common is that they consider their race superior to others and that they use coercive physical manipulations to carry out their ideas. Both Judaism and Nazism improve human design in order to benefit their own races by either neonatal circumcision or racial purification. Both doctrines forced eugenic methods such as marriage restrictions, racial segregation and were chauvinistic, xenophobic and racialistic. Basically, the communist regimes did the same but with the difference that they also discriminated and eliminated economical classes within their own ethnoses. Their above-national class-centrism was known as proletarian internationalism.
Any alliance including religious grouping by necessity develops ethnocentric ideology. Judaism, for instance, affirms that Jewish men are God-chosen and superior to gentiles. Undoubtedly, the declared advantage of the Jewish race is religious chauvinism. That we are used to it because it is normal to Abrahamic religions does not change things but only shows how Abrahamics’ ethics are conductive to racism.
Judaism as any other of faith-organizing system is ethnocentric and racialistic. But Judaism was the first ideology that went a practical step further toward racial discrimination. Throughout its long history Judaism has not only claimed that Jewish people are different but persistently made them such. It has rendered Jews physically and spiritually different by compulsory inflicting the alleged God’s mark of circumcision.
Later Islam fell into the same habit but with a slight difference in the age of circumcision producing in this way a somewhat more pragmatically-oriented, erotic pleasure-seeking and liking more concrete promises variation of the refined God-chosen tribe. Islam also introduced pedocircumcision of women which has similar mental but less obvious social effects as that of men because of the subordinated role of women. Severe adversity between the neonatal and childhood circumcision sub races of man followed as usually happens with close rivals.
Judaism openly admits that the main purpose of the self-inflicted bodily mark is to alter mentality. Jews knew that pedocircumcision is not merely a physical sigh but also marks the soul and inclines to religiousness. Judaism modifies the individuality of Jewish men in keeping with its goals. It persistently makes them neurophysiologicaly different. It has created an artificial sub-race of physically marked but most importantly refined, obedient god-fearing people, according to its own words.
Religious pedocircumcision is racism at work. And as history proves it is a very effective type of non-genetic bioengineering. The spiritually improved race, for instance, is quite touchy and irrational. It easily becomes aggressive when its sacred rituals are questioned and mixes cause and effects. Thus Israelis, whose predecessors have invented and used eugenic racial methods for millennia, accuse Europe of “fostering hate and racist trends” for its attempts to disallow the practical and physical racialism of Jews and Muslims.[i]
Biological vs cultural diversity
For nature and constitution
and vision divide us from
all of you forever.
Maurice Samuel, “You Gentiles”
As long as sensitivity forms perception bodily differences lead to cultural diversity. As long as body determines the mind it should not be needlessly modified. Artificial body manipulation fabricates artificial and irreconcilable cultural differences. Pedocircumcision moulds false ethnicities according to its mode and generates interethnic tensions.
The concept of the Circumcision complex suggests that the greatest difference between ethnoses is neither culturally nor genetically determined but is physiologically induced. Those who deny the reality of the Circumcision complex but at the same time admit the reality of Jewish and Muslim stereotypes must be racists or religious fanatics. Those who deny the possibility of physically inducing intellectual difference can only resort to racial advantages, to God’s privileges or religious chauvinism in order to explain the specificity of Jewish intellect. And that is exactly what Jews are inclined to abide to throughout their history. The concept of the Circumcision complex virtually eliminates cultural and religious prejudice.
The specificity of Jewish people has been recognized by other races. This has caused trouble to Jews because they were minorities in foreign countries. Jews’ reaction to the increasing interethnic tensions was to make circumcision tighter and to increase the artificial racial difference. It is as if the mental effects of pedocircumcision embodied in the circumcising ethnoses defended themselves and struggled for survival.
Each opposition differentiates the conflicting parties. But when the antagonism mentally alters opponents the conflict can only intensify and tends to become insoluble. As friends go neurophysiologicaly different they lose contact with each other and tend to become foes. They begin to speak different languages and their living on good terms becomes increasingly impossible. The mental effects of mass pedocircumcision are bound to ever escalate the interethnic hostility.
Aposthic sub-races of antiracists?
Judaism moderates sexuality by trimming it at biological level. It would hardly hesitate to modify the human genome of the population toward asexual godliness if this was technically possible. Undoubtedly then Judaism would have created an aposthic Jewish race long ago claiming that it was god’s intention. And their God knows that this race would be superior to all because it was chosen by Him.
But there is no such thing as antiracist production of races. Artificial production of races be it aposthic ones is undoubtedly a racialistic endeavour.
Judaism exhibits racialistic elements. It perpetually produces an aposthic (foreskinless) human sub-race of a different mind-set, emotionality and hence morality. It uses neurophysiological manipulation aiming at psychological change. Judaism considers that foreskin is morally defective and removes it. It contains masochistic, anti-sex and anti-pleasure elements.
Similar racist elements exist in Islam as far as circumcision is obligatory. But the details and compulsoriness of pedocircumcision in Islam vary because the holiest of their writs – the Qur’an – does not mention the practice. The weakened ideological basis of pedocircumcision in Islam has allowed Islamic sects that circumcise at different age or even do not necessitate the operation to emerge and has thus rendered Islam heterogeneous.
Practices that modify the body and the sensorial apparatus for ideological purposes are antihuman and racialistic, and should be outlawed. Practices that produce artificial cultural diversity and ethnocentrism or such that generate non-natural chauvinism by body modifications are antidemocratic and xenophobic. The same holds also true to religions that support or require such practices.
Almost all religions claim to be superior to others. By necessity they are ethnocentric, chauvinistic and antidemocratic, and nourish aggressive nationalistic beliefs. Religions that modify the body in order to alter the mind for their own benefit are frankly antihuman and racialistic.
Religion is the only institution that is still allowed to infringe bodily and psychic integrity in democratic societies. Undoubtedly, ethnocentric and body-altering practices and/or religions should be abolished. Of course this is going to eradicate pedocircumcision. Hopefully, most of terrorism too.