A peacetime holocaust
One way or another the circumcision-induced neuroses have become incorporated in social standards. Inevitably, they have been integrated in the stereotypes of the circumcising groups or have even been legalized in circumcising nations. Misunderstood scientific ethics and the obsessive and unwise avoidance of any discrimination typical of the western democracy obstruct the diagnosis and objective examination of circumcision neuroses. But to refrain from investigating man for ethical reasons is immoral because this biases science, misinterprets reality and maintains ignorance.
The interference of morality in science corrupts its objectivity. An example for corrupted science is the Nazi anthropology that resulted in the Holocaust. Other modern examples of ethnically and/or religiously biased medicine are the omission of the prepuce in anatomy textbooks,[i] the misinterpretation of its biological functions as well as avoidance medical examination of the neurophysiological effects of pedocircumcision or the disregard of its psychological effects by psychiatry.
Races are biological and hence neuropsychological realities. Racial characteristics must be recognised in order to be treated properly and safely. Ignoring biological differences at work makes their mental aspects appear intentional and menacing. Lack of knowledge about the subtle long-tern effects of pedocircumcision makes people invent arbitrary causes for them. Disregard of objective racial differences naturally creates interethnic tensions and xenophobia.
Hiding facts is equivalent to falsifying them. Religious and ethnic bias enslaves people and makes them aggressive and vulnerable.
Humanism is not a fear of differences
It is the social background that evaluates racial and ethnic differences. Races differ from each other but cultural positives and negatives are relative. Stressing the negative traits of a race is a result of the prevalent social bias. It automatically takes place where races coexist but are races formally unrecognized and/or origin of racial differences is unknown. Humanism requires that all races are treated with equal respect and no race is inferior but not that races do not exist.
The current democratic system ignores racial realities and endeavours to treat races equally while they are not. The expansion of terrorism during recent decades comes to show that democracy reaps the social tensions that its ignorant equalization has sown and rendered invisible.
Assuming that the Jewish race is inferior is preposterously unobjective because it emphasises the negative traits of ethic dispositions. Focussing on the negative traits of Jewish ethnos is, of course, biased. It ascribes purposefulness to Jewish stereotypic traits and conspirational nature to Jewish ethnocentrism. The roots of anti-Semitism are in the lack of recognition of the unconscious nature of the steady ethnic Jewish traits.
But presenting Jews as an inferior race is as preposterously unobjective as is portraying male anatomy without its main erogenous tentacle. Both racial and preputial discriminations are examples of ethnically biased science. Only the first of them, however, is considered immoral nowadays. This moral inequality of untrue statements favours religion and religious practices such as pedocircumcision. It comes to show that currently the sexually repressive religious morality of the circumcising religions has overridden both medical ethics and scientific objectivity.
Ancients straightforwardly considered prepuce as a moral imperfection. Nowadays ethnically biased medicine preaches the same thing but by advancing one-sided scientific arguments in favour of pedocircumcision. A result of the ethnic bias in medicine is that the highest medical authority of modernity swallows and even backs the offensive to the greater part of mankind religious fiction that the male prepuce is a congenital defect, a morbid growth or a redundant and at least morally unhealthy appendage. Recently the World Health Organization alluded that natural state is unwholesome and even pathological. This allows many contemporary physicians to insinuate that sexuality is unclean as circumcising religions have been nagging from time immemorial. However, the opinion of the WHO fluctuates quite unreliably for reasons independent of medical practice.
Discrimination against prepuce vs discrimination against circumcision
At least a century ago science was advanced enough to be able to detect and objectively investigate the psychological effects of circumcision. However, this did not happen then due to the wide spread of pedocircumcision and to the subjectivity it imposes on thinking. The psychological effects of pedocircumcision either directly or indirectly by religious requirements have always hampered and still obstruct their own objectification. The psychology that had to reveal the mental effects of circumcision was insensitive to them. And the same is valid for all religiousness, philosophy, science and art that pedocircumcision stimulated. As a result, the democratic legislations that had to defend body integrity didn’t define it properly due to overtolerance to religions.
The mental difference that pedocircumcision has perpetually generated isolated the circumcising groups, caused ethnic segregation and interethnic tensions, and instigated anti-Semitism during the last two millennia. Neonatal circumcision has had a long-term effect on mentality as the Bible suggested so toleration to neonatal circumcision as long as it existed was all the time only formal.
The habit of mass neonatal circumcision stems from the religious anti-sex moral of Abrahamic religions. The insinuation in the Old Testament that the male prepuce is a moral deficiency and attests ungodliness has indoctrinated Abrahamics including Christians. This together with the Jewish invasion has made western democracies get round the democratic principles
The first prerequisite for democracy’s tolerance of pedocircumcision and hence of anti-Semitism is the general unawareness of ancients about many of the subtle long-lasting effects of pedocircumcision on mentality. This allowed ancient Greeks and Romans to tolerate more or less the Jewish rite of neonatal circumcision.
Hatred of the prepuce has brought about hatred of circumcision and anti-Semitism and has promoted Christianity. Jews hate the foreskin and kill it. The Jewish hatred of the foreskin has invoked hatred of Jews. Discrimination against the prepuce has led to discrimination against its agents. Unfortunately, this revenge is subconscious and takes innocent victims.
The peacetime holocaust is quite civilized and merciful. It does not kill members of a group but merely desensitizes members of the male body. Its wide spreading, however, compensates for its peacefulness. Yet, the soft genocide is also coercive and does not spare children. Actually it victimizes them exclusively.