Circumcision has become a cornerstone of history. This is so because it has profound and clandestine effects on mentality. The ancient obsession with the foreskin is here to stay. Pedocircumcision has always been and is still equalized with religious and ethnic identities because it actually produces them.
In the long term the psychological effects of pedocircumcision dispose to idealism, utopianism and piousness. Inevitably they have a significant contribution in the shaping of religious and ethnic traits and the stereotypes of circumcising groups. Noticeably, small differences such as the time, style or degree and compulsoriness of pedocircumcision differentiate the branches of Abrahamic religions and the sects within them. But these differences are not formal at all. They are only seemingly insignificant because even minute details of a neurophysiological intervention alter psychology and have a great social impact. In confirmation, the differences in the time of circumcision have roused disproportionally fierce enmity even between the very circumcising religions and sects. This is possible because the mental effects of circumcision lack self-regulation and are obsessive.
During the course of European history the psychological effects of neonatal circumcision have differentiated and consolidated the Jewish ethnos. The psychological effects of neonatal circumcision have aided the development of Jewish stereotypic traits such as acquisitiveness, clannishness and religiousness. They have fuelled its abstract and utopian ideologies and fostered the intellectual advance of Jews. The set of stereotypic traits is complex and consolidates the Jewish ethnos at many levels. The complexity and closeness of Jewish ethnos as well as its disposition to intellectual work and usury appears deliberate and suspicious to non-Jews. Naturals have interpreted the persistent and wide spread effects of neonatal circumcision as a Jewish conspiracy. The mental effects of neonatal circumcision have provoked an automatic anti-Semitic reaction in naturals who are ignorant to the cause of the Jewish ethnic traits. The process of alienation of Jews and gentiles has consolidated both groups and intensified their conflict. The resulting chain of confrontations has spanned for many centuries. These counterreaction actions achieved their horrible culmination at the Nazi Holocaust.
If the psychological effects of pedocircumcision were acknowledged earlier histroy would surely have taken a different course. If the role of the neonatal circumcision in the forming of Jewish stereotypic traits were rationalized at the beginning of the 20th century, for instance, they could not have been misinterpreted and demonized by Nazi ideology. If the mental effects of pedocircumcision were then recognized anthropology would not have been used for political goals by the fascist propaganda. Then Jews could have neither been proclaimed for an inferiority race nor could they have been accused of conspiracy. Perhaps if the psychosocial consequences of neonatal circumcision were known before the World War II the Holocaust would not have taken place. Understanding that neonatal circumcision favours the development of false ethnic traits and various obsessions would limit the Nazis’ anti-Semitic actions to occupational discrimination and to a ban on circumcision.
Without the inner enemy personified by Jews Hitler’s Nazism would have been ineffective. WWII could have taken a different course or could have even been avoided. Without circumcision sciences could have taken a more objective and realistic course. The true science has nothing to do with democracy and diplomacy and is often undemocratic as it aims to objectify and differentiate. There is no such thing as a politically correct science. Nor as a neutrality of beliefs.
Without the traditional pedocircumcision anti-Semitism, Jewish conspiracy theories, Islamic fundamentalism and Zionism, and religious terrorism would not exits or would be considerably milder.
If circumcision was abolished earlier in history science would have been more concrete. Anthropology, history, humanistic and social science would not fall in stagnation and would not be limited by ethnic and moral considerations as they are today.
Nowadays as a result of the long-term mental effects of pedocircumcision things have gone so far that scientific investigation of circumcision and comparison of races and ethnic groups is considered unethical. Even biology students are taught that genetic differences within a race are or may be smaller than those among different races. Science is forced to unlearn and neglect racial differences as if races did not exist at all or were only imaginary or conditional categories. But races are physical realities. Any minor of any race, for example, instantly perceives racial differences and brings disgrace on the moralizing science blinded by ethical considerations. The prejudiced science conceals racial and biologically induced differences. In this way it maintains them, empowers their effects and further compromises its own objectivity.
The moralizing science contributes to increasing the ethnic and religious intolerance and sets a time-bomb for the generations to come. The next WWIII could only be could only be religion-based. And neither an ethnically biased science nor a religiously overtolerant democracy can prevent it. It is that advisable medical doctors throw away religious bias and stop advertising pedocircumcision so as to avoid turning to be the convicts on the next UN tribunal. We could also appeal to priests and preachers of the circumcising religions to stop acting lake physicians and psychologists.
If the truthfulness of the wise words of the Torah saying that circumcision makes people love God was appreciated a century ago the Holocaust could have been reduced to nothing more than a social discrimination. Perhaps, if the psychological effects of neonatal circumcision were properly understood even earlier in history then anti-Semitism could not have taken the form of a genocide.
Modern democracy is a continuation of the ancient Roman and Greek cultures. It gradually resurrected about 1500 years after monotheism subjugated them. What would the world be today in social plan without pedocircumcision? Perhaps without its influence on reasoning monotheistic religions would have never gained enough political power and would be unable to displace democracy. Perhaps without the totalitarian monotheisms of Abrahamics the Dark Ages would have never shown round.
If the Circumcision complex was recognized earlier in history the world would be a considerably more democratic, more tolerant, and less militant place today. If mass pedocircumcision was banned prior to the invention of bombs religious terrorism and suicidal bombings would be virtually unknown or extremely rare nowadays.